Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Therapy. 2016; 9 (2): 48-54
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-182865

ABSTRACT

Objective/Background: Progesterone-receptor negativity [PR-] is predictive of adverse outcomes in estrogen receptor-positive [ER+] breast cancer. The Oncotype DX assay provides risk stratification for hormone receptor-positive [HR+] invasive breast cancer; however, the association of PR status and Oncotype DX recurrence scores [RSs] is less clear


Methods: We designed an analysis to determine whether a significant difference exists in the RS for ER+/PR- tumors when compared with ER+/PR+ breast cancer. Three hundred and fifty patients with HR+ invasive breast cancer who underwent Oncotype DX testing at our institution from December 2006 to October 2013 were included. We also examined the concordance in the HR status reported by immunohistochemical [IHC] and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction [RT-PCR] analyses. The data were analyzed by analysis of variance, F test, t test, and chi-square tests. Multivariate linear regression was used to determine significant predictors of Oncotype DX RS


Results: A total of 301 patients had ER+/PR+ tumors and 47 patients had ER+/PR- tumors by IHC. PR- tumors had a significantly higher RS than PR+ tumors [24.7 +/- 8.53 vs. 17.3 +/- 7.38; p < .001], predicting a greater 10-year risk of distant recurrence. Multivariate linear regression showed PR status and tumor grade to be significant predictors of Oncotype DX RS [p < .0001]. A total of 284 patients had HR status reported by Oncotype DX assay. Concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 99.3% for ER and 88.7% for PR


Conclusion: Our study shows that ER+/PR- breast cancer tumors are associated with a significantly higher Oncotype DX scores; this interprets into a higher risk of recurrence. Our data also show that the concordance between IHC and RT-PCR was 99.3% for ER and lower at 88.7% for PR

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL